🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the ideal choice for a bold horror film about Jesus Christ, though not for the motivations many fans may think. Actually, the star doesn't even act as the central religious figure in the new film: his role is listed merely as a craftsman. Cage is positioned as the Joseph within this tale, working to uphold his religious convictions while The Boy (acted by the young actor), their teenage adopted son, begins to exhibit miraculous gifts. The reason it's challenging to picture another leading star in this role is that while the role grows stricken with numerous difficulties, Cage himself looks practically moving confident that this dark, grim little movie is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Recent Projects

Nicolas Cage was spending his time more judiciously in recent years. He yet makes additional projects than most regular audiences may ever watch — for example, did you know that the man has filmed a trio of different cowboy movies in the past three years? — yet he also adds prestige independent films for example one recent hit, Pig, and a further title. This new film seems like in that category, in that it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and approaches a campy-sounding description with gravity.

The Film's Storyline and Direction

Regrettably, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan fails to repay that serious attention. The film starts from a interestingly wandering place, marketed as drawing from an unknown scripture regarding the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, The Mother, and their son relocate constantly, fearful of religious persecution or suspicion over their son's strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. This persists as sinister entities focus on the household in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start with that familiar Biblical temptation for the son.

Sometimes, the film mirrors an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, but not one of the main figures are explicitly taken over. Rather, they are progressively isolated from each other, while these entities affect a nearby girl (the actress, credited as “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and presents everyone disturbing images of a bleak destiny. Cage's role notably grapples with his role in this story, occasionally scolding the son who mystifies him.

Controversy and Care

This material is likely to invite debate, and Nathan handles it with a lot of sensitivity — excessive, perhaps. The concept of a adolescent dealing with his future martyrdom and lured by mysterious forces is indeed terrifying, but Nathan may be hesitant regarding looking exploitative and keen to indicate his intentions, therefore he regularly withdraws to darkly ominous visuals. Characters constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who demonstrated real promise in a recent film update, interestingly — surrenders her acting to her Mother Mary cloak, occasionally interrupted by a few gnarly horror imagery.

The Star's Portrayal and Film's Shortcomings

At the same time, the actor flirts with precisely the type of overacting that his more snickering appreciators may desire. One scene (shown) in promotional material in which he erupts and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of florid outburst is a component of a Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more openly absurd approach would be more effective of his eagerness to be extreme if needed. Rather, the film echoes the less successful low-budget films he starred in during the 2010s — not the cheesy thrillers instead the narrative films and ghost stories that always sound promising, and often contain some select memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, frankly, low-budget DTV material.

Truthfully, some of those, although simpler, were more watchable overall. At this point I must violate my own dogma, not spiritual but career-related: Previously, a beloved editor convinced me to eliminate words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. Such terms express scant other than a personal and broadly stated impatience, withdrawing from the job of vividly conveying the mental and feeling of viewing a specific film. It's hard to express monotony without sounding boring oneself. It's equally vague as calling a movie “interesting.” “Elaborate,” in other words.

But I must confess, I was bored for a large part of the film. On the positive side, it is a devotional type of boredom, not due to this movie is lecturing, but since it requires a sort of patient acceptance to sit through it. At some point soon after starting, this feature enters a cyclic tempo of simmering distress, and never really