Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.